Re: ?? on a weapon system

[DOCAgren@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 6/5/02 2:15:08 PM, MathesonT@aol.com writes:

<< > My players are acting as buyers for a 3rd party,  handling heavy weapon 
> systems purchase.
> 

Unless you really want a dual capability missile, some of the Russian systems 
might be better choices.  Easier to justify how they got on to the weapons 
market and generally produced in larger quantities.  Try  <A 
HREF="http://www.taos-inc.com/airdef.htm";>Air defense Weapons 
of the Former USSR & Russia</A> and look at something like the SA-15 or 
SA-19.  
India and Pakistan would love to get hands on.
 >>

In truth they are trying to spread their $ and using the dual capability they 
are in hopes to.  I agree and have been pushing them into ex-USSR SAMs and AT 
missiles but they saw these are all in 1 options.  And are hoping that High 
Tech works better...


<<> 1.  <A 
HREF="http://www.missilesandfirecontrol.com/our_products/airdefense/ADATS/prod

uct-ADATS.html">ADATS: Lockheed Martin - Missiles and Fire Control</A>>>

    I went to the site, but still have a question.  Are these currently being 
deployed?

<<> 2. <A HREF="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/mgm-157.htm";>Enhanced 
Fiber Optic Guided Missile (EFOGM)</A>   Only a couple of technology 
demonstrator prototypes in existance so hard to get hands on.  Ammo is also 
extremely expensive.>>

    Yep.. that would be bad..

Thanks for the help guys...

DOC Agren

Don't piss off the Garden Gnome with a lightsabre. He's far more dangerous 
than he appears!