[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ?? on a weapon system

To: millenniums-end-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ?? on a weapon system
From: Brian McDonald <brian_mcdonald@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 17:17:02 -0700
References: <109.1379b11c.2a305f79@aol.com><02060610435101.00578@plasticwarriors>
Reply-to: brian_mcdonald@xxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-GB; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726Netscape6/6.1

Gurth wrote:

>According to MathesonT@aol.com, on Thu, 06 Jun 2002 the word on the street was...
>
>>Canada has 34 systems that recently went through a service life extension
>>and Lockheed would gladly build new ones.   The US, RAF and several
>>others evaluated the system, but did not go for it. Probably only three
>>or four systems in existence outside of Canada.
>>
>
>Ten, IIRC -- that is,  I seem to remember from a thread on a modelling forum
>about the ADATS that Thailand bought ten.
>
thai versions are stationary units rather than mobile.  have heard no 
complaints about the adats from anyone i know in the canadian forces.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ?? on a weapon system
  - From: Gurth

References:
- Re: ?? on a weapon system
  - From: MathesonT
- Re: ?? on a weapon system
  - From: Gurth

Prev by Date: Re: ?? on a weapon system
Next by Date: Re: ?? on a weapon system
Previous by thread: Re: ?? on a weapon system
Next by thread: Re: ?? on a weapon system
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread