Re: a really stupid question ...

[MathesonT@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 1/11/01 10:50:41 AM Pacific Standard Time, gurth@xs4all.nl 
writes:

> "Not true" in what sense? Am I wrong in thinking it was an M214, or are you
>  saying an M214 isn't smaller and lighter than an M134 (which, to the best
>  of my knowledge, it is)?
>  
Not true in that the weapon used was an M134 and not an XM214.  It should be 
noted that the XM214 has never entered series production.  Only two limited 
runs for undisclosed customers.  Reportedly under 250 units total.

Rob