[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rail guns (was: US SOCOM desires...)



Robert J. Hansen wrote:

>>or say that someone does come up with that holy grail 
>>of modern science the room temp superconductor.  Can 
>>you say Rail Guns for your infantry.  real powered 
>>armour would become possible.  truly radical things 
>>happen to military tech virtually overnight.
>>
>
>Coincidentally, I happened to work in a Defense Department-funded
>research lab that was looking into properties of HTS (High-Temperature
>Superconductor).  Rail guns were not ever on the wish list.  The problem
>is really simple: Newton's Law of Equal and Opposite Reactions.
>
>A five-gram metal flechette travelling at Mach 10 sounds
>sweet--something like twenty-five times the energy of a 7.62mm rifle
>cartridge.  The problem is this: Mach 10 is approximately 3500 m/s.  The
>kinetic energy equasion is Ke = (m*v*v)/2.
>
>.005 * 3500 * 3500 / 2 = 30,625 joules of energy
>
>If you're going to send that downrange to your target, the rifleman is
>also going to receive 30,625 joules of energy.  You can work out the
>soldier's velocity in a similar way:
>
>2 Ke = (m * v * v)
>2 Ke / m = (v * v)
>sqrt(2 Ke/m) = v
>
>Assuming you've got a 75-kg soldier, your soldier is going to be
>traveling backwards at about 28 meters per second.  Or about 60mph. 
>He's going to hit something, which will slow him down, and that'll be a
>real pain in his ass, let me tell you.
>
>Remember that recoil increases to the square of the velocity.  You want
>a round that travels ten times faster than modern rounds?  Fine--take a
>hundred times the recoil, please, and say hi to Sir Isaac when the
>recoil catapults you all the way into heaven.  :)
>
>
>
>
Well i wasn't really thinking of jacking up the velocity so much as 
reducing the mass of the ammunition carried for instance.
Also if one reduced the mass somewhat and put in good recoil compensator 
system you should be able to increase the "power" of the gun quite a bit 
over whats currently feasible without getting into silly stuff ranges.