Re: Terrorist groups

[Lauri Gardner <lauri_gardner@xxxxxxxxx>]

--- Joni Virolainen <joni.virolainen@welho.com> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lauri Gardner" <lauri_gardner@yahoo.com>
> > >
> > No offence, but I do not consider SoF to be
> reliable
> > source on information. I prefer reading reports
> > written by RAND, and those that come from the U.S.
> > Ministry of foreign affairs, as well as some watch
> dog
> > groups. Of course some of the information give in
> > those is incorrect or given on a wrong type of
> slant.
> >
> I don't think that SoF is a very reliable source
> either, but I think that
> the material within can be very well be used in RPG
> scenarios and campaigns.
> I have not read many issues, but those that I read
> gave me that impression.
> 
After buying an issue a few years ago, the price for
two magazine was about the same amount as what I would
pay for a cheapish RPG book. I decided that SoF was
not worth it. There were a couple of articles, but
I've found a couple better magazines for interesting
RPG ideas and equipment reviews (Like the excellent
Backpacker magazine).


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com