Re: Why the F*CK did they do that??

["Robert J. Hansen" <cortana@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> > At least the UK has always kept the "We do not comment
> > on any SAS missions" to keep everyone in the dark.
> 
> No it does not. In recent Sierra Leone operation presense

More than that, too, wasn't there?  I seem to recall a Prince's Gate
incident (or something like that) where terrorists took hostages. 
The UK ramped up the psychological pressure and finally publically
confirmed that the SAS were mobilized and were en route.

The terrorists surrendered without a shot fired once they heard the
SAS was coming in.

That's an extreme example of the effectiveness of psychological
warfare, and also goes to show the UK has a history of confirming SAS
operations when it is psychologically effective to do so.c

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.1

iQA/AwUBO7er+JgOGKeCwjkrEQKp4gCgoZtnXB3UUTz2l8dZVK3PpKAFyEYAnidc
taaCwPfx0X6NWFQ0z44z/pqI
=a6Au
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----