Re: It's now called "Active Denial Technology"...

["Ben" <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff Pawlowski writes:

> --- Roger Burton West <roger@firedrake.org> wrote:
> > ...but note the size of the antenna.
> > 
> > http://www.de.afrl.af.mil/factsheets/activedenial.html
> > 
> 
> Easy to identify the device and easy enough to hit with an RPG.  How is this
> supposed to save lives again?
> 


    Just curious the rotation and tracking rate, i mean, can that thing
keep the beam on a man who is charging and weaving or zigzagging?

Benjamin